The Thousands of Volunteers who Serve the Needy in Toronto

Patrick Gossage • March 26, 2024

Many Torontonians feel a sense of responsibility to our fellow citizens who suffer from homelessness. They make and serve them meals, give them clothing, and often just talk to them and make them feel less ignored and misunderstood. They also discover that those who don’t have a roof over their heads and carry all they own in a knapsack are not druggies, losers or mad people but a cross section of ordinary folks who have fallen on hard times. For them the housing crisis is a joke. They just want food and a bed in a room with a toilet and shower nearby.

Helping them and getting to know them personally is a life changing experience for these volunteers. It was for me on Monday March 18, my first morning giving out meals and supplies in the basement of Toronto’s Church of the Redeemer whose “Common Table” program was serving its usual 140 meals to a variety of marginalized and homeless men and women.


It’s embarrassing how many people are not housed in this benighted city and meeting them on Bloor Street’s “mink mile” was a revelation. In its tracking of the use of publicly-run shelters, the city calculated that on this cold night over 9,642 individuals used the shelter system – and likely 400 were turned away. That total number does not include beds in organizations like the Scott Mission the Salvation Army or Dixon Hall’s three locations, or those sleeping rough on the street, in TTC vehicles, stairwells or tents. These folk could bring the total of unhoused to over 13,000 – a good sized town. Of that total it’s important you know that over 7,000 are in shelters where men or women sleep tightly packed row-on-row on the floor on mattresses clutching their belongings. It’s a scary and demeaning situation, if only marginally better than sleeping on the street. Little wonder that so many prefer sleeping rough or in tents.


One of my early encounters giving out socks and warm clothing was to a skinny sharp-featured indigenous man who told me proudly that he was off to pitch his tent in a secret but very desirable and “very sunny” location. He also showed me a stump of a pinky finger lost to frostbite. Homelessness takes its toll. An average of 45 under- or unhoused people die each year.


It was a red-letter day for a beaming young indigenous man who had scored a room in a native-run project. Two other strong looking older men were arguing about lawyers in a corner. Another was on his computer which he admitted he had trouble hanging on to in the shelters.


The crowd that day was typical, polite except for one raving man, and thankful for the excellent soup, food-to-go and various items we offered at the clothing room. It was like a restaurant and general store, except everything is free. There even are feminine hygiene products I offered to a sad woman along with deodorant and body cream. Toothpaste and a toothbrush for another guy. And Tylenol in a little plastic envelope for another man. New pants for several men and a used pin striped jacket for another who had a job interview that day. We gave a wide range of items to 29 people that morning.


It’s not just the generosity of volunteers, all 70 off them on rotation that keep this show on the road, but of individuals and companies who donate for the “general store. Clothing and personal items come from the congregation, local clothing drives and individuals dropping off their excess. Church of the Redeemer also get a bi-monthly shipment of new clothing from an organization called Brands for Canada. Proctor and Gamble gave a big donation last fall. The church does purchase some items like underwear, razors, soap and shampoo in the individual hotel-sized packaging. It’s an eye opener to realize that our clientele simply hasn’t the money to buy socks or toiletries. Many are on Ontario’s meagre welfare and those not having an address to receive cheques are able to use the church’s address.


Volunteerism attracts staff from 17 different businesses who come in groups to make the scores of sandwiches which are given out on Thursdays and Fridays. The Common Table is unique in sending out two carts those days with sandwiches and other snacks who deliver directly to homeless on the street or in tents. The Common Table also offers, limited nursing care, legal advice, phone and computer service, a book club and hair cuts. There is a dark room available for people who have been up all night and need a place to catch up on sleep.


The grandaddy of organizations that help the needy and homeless in Toronto is also faith based – the Scott Mission which has been serving Toronto’s most needy for over 80 years. They serve breakfast and lunch (over 300,000 meals last year) and provide overnight accommodation as well as a clothing bank that had over 28,000 visits last year. The Mission also offers laundry and showers. Every year over 1,000 volunteers help deliver these services.


I would be remiss if I did not mention Dixon Hall’s Meals on Wheels which is entirely volunteers driven, all 700 of them who drive around in their own cars delivering meals to isolated seniors - 67,000 meals a year. Many are corporate volunteers from banks and other companies. To be eligible seniors must be living with a disability, a chronic or terminal illness or convalescing. Often the arrival of a meal seven days a week is the nearly the only contact the senior has with another person.


And of course, very much in the news and the provider of needed food to families and individuals is the major national charitable organization – Second Harvest which uses 3,000 volunteers in its Toronto warehouse. The crisis in the GTA for people who cannot afford food and rely on food banks is tragic. One person in ten in Toronto used a food bank in 2023 – a shocking number.


It is reassuring that where there is social need there are volunteers to meet it. I have highlighted the role of people freely giving their time to help lessen food insecurity because it is so widespread and because nobody can be a functioning member of society who is hungry. And we are not a third-world country who cannot produce enough food for our population. In fact, there is a sad irony in how much we waste – to the extent that some homeless men take throwaway food from dumpsters behind restaurants.


There are dozens of organizations who rely on volunteers to make the lives of those who are really needy more livable. They bring hope and dignity where most treat those who have fallen out with scorn and silence. It would be good if more people would consider it a moral duty to offer their time to serving those who are on the margins of society.


Humility is not seen as desirable any longer. But you have to show some to do this kind of work. It may be unfashionable to quote Jesus’ words in the Gospel of Mark but they are appropriate when it comes to the volunteerism these organizations need: “If any man desire to be first, the same shall be last of all, and servant of all.”


Churchill had this to say about serving others: “We make a living by what we get. We make a life by what we give.”


Patrick Gossage Insider Political Views

By Patrick Gossage April 14, 2026
In contrast to US inaction after almost weekly mass killings, it took one horrible shooting rampage at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal, in 1980, to start the drive for public policy changes around gun control. But years delays between the mass shooting outrage and actual policy to rid the country of assault rifles doomed the eventual gun buyback program. The polytechnique horror was huge news in our relatively massacre-free nation. That December day, 25-year-old Marc Lépine stalked the hallways and classrooms of the École Polytechnique de Montréal with a semi-automatic rifle and murdered 14 women and injured another 13 people before killing himself. A year later, the Coalition for Gun Control was formed to push for stricter gun laws, led by survivors of the Montreal massacre. Later that year, the federal government passed Bill C-17, which imposed safety training and a mandatory waiting period to get a firearms licence-- not an effective means of controlling automatic rifles. Much later, in1996, Parliament passed the Firearms Act, Bill C-68, driven in part by a push for stricter gun laws following the Montreal massacre. The act created a national firearms registry and imposed new rules for obtaining a gun licence, including background checks. The former Conservative government, under prime minister Stephen Harper, abolished the long-gun registry, which it said placed an unnecessary burden on law-abiding gun owners. Quebec subsequently created its own provincial registry to replace it. It took another horrific killing nine years later in Nova Scotia to force Ottawa to take real action on miliary-style guns. On April 18 and 19, 2020, 51-year-old Gabriel Wortman committed multiple shootings and set fires at 16 locations, killing 22 people before he was killed by the RCMP. On May 1, 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, following through on a 2019 campaign promise, announced an immediate ban on some 1,500 makes and models of assault weapons.. The Canadian government sought to follow New Zealand's lead when at the same time it announced the ban it promised a plan to force gun owners to surrender military-style firearms. But while New Zealand acted quickly, in 2019, Ottawa only launched a long awaited buyback program in 2026. In contrast, the government of then New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda announced its firearms buyback program shortly after a white supremacist killed 51 people at two mosques in Christchurch in March, 2019. In order to move quickly, New Zealand set up mobile units where firearm owners could get refunds in exchange for their firearms. They worked hard to get co-operation from gun owners. Meanwhile, here, the firearms industry and individual gun owners vigorously opposed the project, and it was delayed for years. The program was finally initiated this year with little of the sense of urgency it could have had right after the Nova Scotia killings. It has not been going well. In April, the federal public safety minister's office said more than 67,000 assault-style firearms have been declared by 37,869 firearm owners across Canada. That's just under half of the 136,000 firearms the government had budgeted for when it set aside aside $248.6 million for the program. The precise number of banned firearms in Canada is unknown due to the end of the long-gun registry in 2012. There are other deeper problems. Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba have indicated they will not assist with the program, meaning police are not co-operating as in New Zealand. Conservative MPs and firearm owners say the buyback is a wasteful exercise that targets law-abiding citizens. The original gun-control advocacy group, PolySeSouvient, blames “weak political leadership” for what it calls “poor participation” in the compensation program. It looks like Ottawa - to put it mildly - has blown the opportunity to really reduce the number of people-killing guns in this country.
By Patrick Gossage March 12, 2026
One of the major differences between these two men is that Carney understands the value of well-thought-out strategy, abundantly clear in his Davos speech, which laid out one for middle powers to deal with the end of a rules-based international order and the rise of hegemony. Trump's lack of strategic understanding is clear in his bumbling attempts to justify the billion-dollar-a-day Iran war. His overall tactic of “flooding the zone” – mounting a new initiative or major announcement every day, or even several times a day to ensure press and opposition can never catch up. This tactic has served him well – confusing the world and his would-be opponents into submission under a valley of activity and harsh opinions from the leader of the world. Contrast this approach to leadership from Carney. He is systematically building a nation less dependent on US trade by travelling the world building new alliances and trading partners. And in the scare of Australia giving substance to his idea of alliances with middle powers. All laid out in the Davos speech. It is instructive to appreciate how much Trump was irritated by the Davos speech. Carney got a standing ovation; Trump’s rambling lengthy diatribe did not. He won’t soon forget being so upstaged. He surely recognized an intellectual power he could never match. Carney is a realist and pragmatic when he stated recently “We take the world as it is, not as we wish it to be.” He is dealing with the world that is being reshaped by an irrational power-mad president, a world the powerful Stephen Miller said “that is governed by strength, that is governed by force, that is governed by power. These are the iron laws of the world.” Does Carney sometimes err on the side of supporting Trump likely to ensure that critical talks on free trade and tariffs have some chance of finding a sympathetic ear? Yes; first he seemed to fully support Trump’s war with Iran. He later made his support more nuanced, saying Trump’s actions were against the rules-based international order. He now says we will not get involved unless a NATO ally is threatened. But generally, Carney is highly rational in contrast to Trump’s self-centered irrationality. Take Trump’s bizarre ill-informed letter to the Prime Minister of Norway, who had no role in deciding if he got the Nobel Peace Prize: “I no longer feel obligated to think purely of Peace (he subsequently engaged in an ever expanding war against Iran). He then reiterated his demand for “complete and Total Control, of Greenland. Thank you!”. His late-night rants, complete with caps, on social media show a mind out of control. Thay are dutifully reported on US news media and often astonish with their non sequiturs and nastiness. One of his more unpresidential quotes came as he fingered White House drapes: “I chose these myself. I always liked gold." The big question for Canadians who are more and more disillusioned with the antics of the President: could these two opposite ever sit down and do a deal that works for Canada. The two do text, and Carney has admitted that in private Trump does listen. But there is also evidence that the trade people in the White House do not like Canada, and as Trump has said, we owe our very existence to the US. And we are “difficult”. They have said that the current trade deal is not good for the US and could be trashed entirely and -deals with Mexico and Canada could be separate and the current trilateral deal may be dead.  Canada was at the brink of reducing the heavy sectoral tariffs on steel, aluminum, and lumber when Premier Ford’s unfortunate ads during the Rose Bowl that featured President Reagan speaking against the usefulness of Tariffs led To Trump suspending talks. They only recently resumed. So can our world-renowned businessman and banker hope to sit down with the unpredictable and unstable President and cut a deal? Some hope that if we extend talks, the President, weakened by the midterms, the bad economic fallout from an unpopular war, and the fragmentation of the MAGA movement may be easier to deal with. On the other hand he may badly need a “win,” bullying big concessions out of Canada and reaping so-cabled benefits from a weaker free trade deal. There is a scenario where Trump gets a black eye if Carney simply walks away with the conviction, perhaps easily shared with an increasingly nationalistic and confident Canada that “no deal is better than a bad deal.” In any case, what a decisive and challenging future we face with Canada at play. Can Carney win for Canada against his opposite by losing a deal?"
More Posts