Governments Failed Refugees Being Sheltered by Churches

Patrick Gossage • August 30, 2023

A month ago Refugees camping outside in downtown Toronto because there was no shelter in the Toronto system for them found themselves being bused to Revivaltime Tabernacle Church in North York where beds were set up for nearly 250 in their basement. They were able to have showers for the first time in days.

The stunning generosity of this church, two others and dozens of volunteers, as well as black-led social agencies for immigrants meant asylum seekers were fed, got clothing looked after while the government argued about who was responsible and Toronto lobbied the federal government for funds. A few days later a shamed federal government pledged $97 million but the city said this was not enough. However plans were made to offer refugees hotel rooms.


Pastor Judith James from Revivalism showed a remarkable dedication  to the refugees, most of whom are from Africa: “We are not going to stop ensuring  that our people see that even when Canada turns their back on them our community will always fight for our community.”


She is shocked that when black activists and volunteers have taken the refugees off the street apparently the government thought the issue was solved. It was not. Expenses looking after scores of refugees still not housed ran into the thousands. They waited to see something from the $97 million pledged which appeared to be caught up in the bureaucracy. James said, “The Church stepped in because the state checked out.” 


So, volunteers continued to cook and look after the refugees and expenses mounted. It was only on August 25 that finally the city got the funds. A day later the church said goodbye to the last refugees who now had hotel rooms.


For weeks the federal government indifference to real need was shameful and the actions of the black church community a powerful example of faith in action that we see all too little of from the established churches. But as James insists, they should not have had to do government’s work in the first place..


This untenable situation can be seen as the sharp end of the endlessly debated “housing crisis”. The 5.8 Million housing deficit enumerated by CHMC somehow seems disconnected from the homeless on the mean streets of Toronto and all over the GTA . All there people want is a room with a room that locks. Charities, not developers have been trying to humanize how they are looked after for decades. Now we have churches saving hundreds of people we have allegedly welcomed to Canada but were relegated to camping on the street. Toronto shelters over 10,000 homeless most nights. Can’t we do better? 


It’s ironic that while Justin Trudeau stood proudly in front of his cabinet following the recent retreat in PEI and admitted there was no silver bullet to solve the housing crisis but how seriously they were taking it, This while these churches in Toronto continued to shelter the refugees waiting for support or housing for them.


Tommy Douglas once said: “We are all in this world together and the only test of our character that matters is how we look after the least fortunate among us.“ Indeed.


Canada will be judged not by how many houses we build for the middle class but whether or not we can house and rehabilitate the most needy – those with no home at all. This is a moral imperative, as well as a social imperative for our big cities. It is one that was answered by black church members in Toronto, but must be answered by governments.

Patrick Gossage Insider Political Views

A couple in matching formalwear walks the red carpet, surrounded by photographers and camera flashes.
By Patrick Gossage August 11, 2026
Watching cringeworthy video of our former PM’s hand on popstars Katy Perry’s bum at the Tribeca film festival gave me pause about who our former leader had become.
By Patrick Gossage April 14, 2026
In contrast to US inaction after almost weekly mass killings, it took one horrible shooting rampage at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal, in 1980, to start the drive for public policy changes around gun control. But years delays between the mass shooting outrage and actual policy to rid the country of assault rifles doomed the eventual gun buyback program. The polytechnique horror was huge news in our relatively massacre-free nation. That December day, 25-year-old Marc Lépine stalked the hallways and classrooms of the École Polytechnique de Montréal with a semi-automatic rifle and murdered 14 women and injured another 13 people before killing himself. A year later, the Coalition for Gun Control was formed to push for stricter gun laws, led by survivors of the Montreal massacre. Later that year, the federal government passed Bill C-17, which imposed safety training and a mandatory waiting period to get a firearms licence-- not an effective means of controlling automatic rifles. Much later, in1996, Parliament passed the Firearms Act, Bill C-68, driven in part by a push for stricter gun laws following the Montreal massacre. The act created a national firearms registry and imposed new rules for obtaining a gun licence, including background checks. The former Conservative government, under prime minister Stephen Harper, abolished the long-gun registry, which it said placed an unnecessary burden on law-abiding gun owners. Quebec subsequently created its own provincial registry to replace it. It took another horrific killing nine years later in Nova Scotia to force Ottawa to take real action on miliary-style guns. On April 18 and 19, 2020, 51-year-old Gabriel Wortman committed multiple shootings and set fires at 16 locations, killing 22 people before he was killed by the RCMP. On May 1, 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, following through on a 2019 campaign promise, announced an immediate ban on some 1,500 makes and models of assault weapons.. The Canadian government sought to follow New Zealand's lead when at the same time it announced the ban it promised a plan to force gun owners to surrender military-style firearms. But while New Zealand acted quickly, in 2019, Ottawa only launched a long awaited buyback program in 2026. In contrast, the government of then New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda announced its firearms buyback program shortly after a white supremacist killed 51 people at two mosques in Christchurch in March, 2019. In order to move quickly, New Zealand set up mobile units where firearm owners could get refunds in exchange for their firearms. They worked hard to get co-operation from gun owners. Meanwhile, here, the firearms industry and individual gun owners vigorously opposed the project, and it was delayed for years. The program was finally initiated this year with little of the sense of urgency it could have had right after the Nova Scotia killings. It has not been going well. In April, the federal public safety minister's office said more than 67,000 assault-style firearms have been declared by 37,869 firearm owners across Canada. That's just under half of the 136,000 firearms the government had budgeted for when it set aside aside $248.6 million for the program. The precise number of banned firearms in Canada is unknown due to the end of the long-gun registry in 2012. There are other deeper problems. Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba have indicated they will not assist with the program, meaning police are not co-operating as in New Zealand. Conservative MPs and firearm owners say the buyback is a wasteful exercise that targets law-abiding citizens. The original gun-control advocacy group, PolySeSouvient, blames “weak political leadership” for what it calls “poor participation” in the compensation program. It looks like Ottawa - to put it mildly - has blown the opportunity to really reduce the number of people-killing guns in this country.
More Posts