Goodbye Justin – Why is he not Connecting to Canadians

Patrick Gossage • January 14, 2025

The Liberals liked to tell us that the problems they have are not with the wonderful programs they have delivered for Canadians but that they had been unable to communicate them effectively. What if the real problem was the communicator-in-chief, Justin Trudeau, ever more repetitive and tightly scripted, was simply not connecting with the public anymore? In fact, he’s been alienating them?

Why did Trudeau stop connecting with Canadians? In recent months, no matter how much he spent on programs to entice the including dental care and pharmacare and a raft of programs to increase the supply of rental and new housing, his approval remained at the lowest level of any Prime Minister ever. Let’s try and give this a professional analysis. 


Certainly, he was visible enough. Appearing daily on TV domestically fronting every new program in the fall. Plus, landing regularly at head of government meetings and conferences all over the world and getting clips on TV. 


So, the first conclusion is a serious problem well known to political strategists: he has been terribly overexposed. The public simply has become tired of the daily Justin face on TV trying to reach out to them  always using the same words like “continuing to” invest in Canadians. And we’ve grown wary of his self-conscious, self-satisfied smirks when he thinks he’s answered a question effectively when in fact he almost never addresses a question directly. And the profuse use of “uhs” which simply annoy.


Many who dislike him call him a “phony.” One hears that a lot. Also “inauthentic,” it’s hard to see that he believes in what he says – a basic quality of good communication is for the speaker to believe what he or she says and show it. A “showman” who’s all performance - which has been related to his time as a drama teacher. Shannon Proudfoot of the Globe and Mail wrote about the real emotion he finally displayed in his resignation: “…it has been a long time since Mr. Trudeau betrayed anything that seemed like a real reaction that responded directly to the moment.”   

Also, he has almost no humor. A key element in any effective communication. Especially for social media. As is spontaneity which is now very rare as Justin repeats worn talking points at nauseum.


One may well ask what happened to his ability to communicate  after he did such a credible job day after day informing us during the Covid crisis. Perhaps his own fatigue and lack of enthusiasm being such a target of unrelenting attacks and nastiness. He is human and also suffered the departure of his wife. At times like this one tends to fall back on comfortable and familiar ways of expressing oneself.


There is also the tendency in his speaking to say the obvious as if it was a revelation. “Captain Obvious” some might say. The writer and critic Bob Ramsay put it this way: “Trudeau is also a heavy user of the phrase “hard-working,” as in ‘hard-working Canadians.’ This flattery is so tired and fake that it’s cringe-worthy. When we hear him say it, are we really meant to connect more with him, to believe he understands us, that we’re a bunch of hard-working folks bonding over our common cause?” He also repeatedly says when dealing with a serious issue   “ We are working round the clock on this.” As if…


Finally, there is the ill-defined motivation for the overall Liberal program. The obsessive purpose to work for the “middle-class and people working hard to join it.” This was the spine of the Liberal platform in 2015 and has been endlessly repeated. Note this statement made going into the Charlottetown Cabinet retreat in 2013: “We made a commitment to stand up for the middle class, and we will not stop fighting until everyone has a real and fair chance to succeed. As we head into a new Parliamentary session next week, we remain focused on the things that matter most to Canadians: making life more affordable and creating good, middle-class jobs now and into the future.”


This verbose promise to create a “chance to succeed for everyone” and “good middle-class jobs” is so vague as to mean nothing. It is belied by the fact that it is the middle-class that has been hit hard by inflation, and the rising cost of groceries and housing. It is also typical of the Liberals tendency to overpromise and underdeliver, an ironclad rule of political “not to do’s.” And of course, the not stop fighting juvenile description of the Liberal’s unflagging dedication! It’s worth noting that none of these placebos are goes for social media clips so important for so many


Finally, there is the question of who comes to the strong defense of Canada when it is threatened. Certainly not Justin Trudeau, on holiday when Trump launched his bombastic threats to our sovereignty and economy. Bullies need strong resistance, or they keep bullying. Justin has yet to articulate the kind of national pride that Jean Chretien did so masterfully in the Star on January 11, as addressed to Trump: “ What could make you think would ever give up the best country in the world – and make no mistake we are – to join the United States…If you think that threatening and insulting us is going to win us over don’t know a thing about us.” He then lists the key values we all share, like tolerance, and the generous social safety nets we have built. It’s one of the best defenses of our nation I have seen in years. It could have been a memorable part of Trudeau’s farewell. It wasn’t.


In conclusion, the style, content, and mode of expression of Justin Trudeau has steadily led to the increasing lack of trustworthiness of this government ‘s chief communicator. As a former PMO script and media release writer I can only say that his staff have allowed him to fall into a groove which has reduced his authority and credibility. 

Patrick Gossage Insider Political Views

A couple in matching formalwear walks the red carpet, surrounded by photographers and camera flashes.
By Patrick Gossage August 11, 2026
Watching cringeworthy video of our former PM’s hand on popstars Katy Perry’s bum at the Tribeca film festival gave me pause about who our former leader had become.
By Patrick Gossage April 14, 2026
In contrast to US inaction after almost weekly mass killings, it took one horrible shooting rampage at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal, in 1980, to start the drive for public policy changes around gun control. But years delays between the mass shooting outrage and actual policy to rid the country of assault rifles doomed the eventual gun buyback program. The polytechnique horror was huge news in our relatively massacre-free nation. That December day, 25-year-old Marc Lépine stalked the hallways and classrooms of the École Polytechnique de Montréal with a semi-automatic rifle and murdered 14 women and injured another 13 people before killing himself. A year later, the Coalition for Gun Control was formed to push for stricter gun laws, led by survivors of the Montreal massacre. Later that year, the federal government passed Bill C-17, which imposed safety training and a mandatory waiting period to get a firearms licence-- not an effective means of controlling automatic rifles. Much later, in1996, Parliament passed the Firearms Act, Bill C-68, driven in part by a push for stricter gun laws following the Montreal massacre. The act created a national firearms registry and imposed new rules for obtaining a gun licence, including background checks. The former Conservative government, under prime minister Stephen Harper, abolished the long-gun registry, which it said placed an unnecessary burden on law-abiding gun owners. Quebec subsequently created its own provincial registry to replace it. It took another horrific killing nine years later in Nova Scotia to force Ottawa to take real action on miliary-style guns. On April 18 and 19, 2020, 51-year-old Gabriel Wortman committed multiple shootings and set fires at 16 locations, killing 22 people before he was killed by the RCMP. On May 1, 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, following through on a 2019 campaign promise, announced an immediate ban on some 1,500 makes and models of assault weapons.. The Canadian government sought to follow New Zealand's lead when at the same time it announced the ban it promised a plan to force gun owners to surrender military-style firearms. But while New Zealand acted quickly, in 2019, Ottawa only launched a long awaited buyback program in 2026. In contrast, the government of then New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda announced its firearms buyback program shortly after a white supremacist killed 51 people at two mosques in Christchurch in March, 2019. In order to move quickly, New Zealand set up mobile units where firearm owners could get refunds in exchange for their firearms. They worked hard to get co-operation from gun owners. Meanwhile, here, the firearms industry and individual gun owners vigorously opposed the project, and it was delayed for years. The program was finally initiated this year with little of the sense of urgency it could have had right after the Nova Scotia killings. It has not been going well. In April, the federal public safety minister's office said more than 67,000 assault-style firearms have been declared by 37,869 firearm owners across Canada. That's just under half of the 136,000 firearms the government had budgeted for when it set aside aside $248.6 million for the program. The precise number of banned firearms in Canada is unknown due to the end of the long-gun registry in 2012. There are other deeper problems. Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba have indicated they will not assist with the program, meaning police are not co-operating as in New Zealand. Conservative MPs and firearm owners say the buyback is a wasteful exercise that targets law-abiding citizens. The original gun-control advocacy group, PolySeSouvient, blames “weak political leadership” for what it calls “poor participation” in the compensation program. It looks like Ottawa - to put it mildly - has blown the opportunity to really reduce the number of people-killing guns in this country.
More Posts