Would the Real Doug Ford Please Stand Up

Patrick Gossage • June 11, 2025
Doug Ford is giving a speech in front of a crowd.

Who is the is the real Doug Ford? Is it the smiling man walking beside Premier of Alberta Danielle Smith into the meeting of the Premiers with the PM intoning “love is in the air”(!) or the inept initiator of the Green Belt scandal which sold protected land to his developer friends – for which he apologized while reversing the order?


Who is he? The skilled leader of the Council of the Federation, who on national TV characterized the meeting with the PM as the best in his seven years attending such meetings, or the Premier who starves the public health system and according to the Ontario Nurses Association “is trying bring in American-style health care by systematically increasing the role of private, for-profit corporations at the expense of our public system.”


He rode his posture as Captain Canada “protecting Ontario” from Trump tariffs and demanding a new bigger mandate to an election victory in February, even though he has no formal role in the federal campaign to negotiate a new trade and security agreement with Trump. He relishes this posture, even travelling to Washington on February 13 with other Premiers and somehow getting the chance to deliver an anti-tariff message to two senior White House staff. This doubtless helped his re-election bid.


In October, prior to the much-anticipated election call, Ford announced a $200 “rebate” cheque for all Ontarians to help defray the high cost of living. Buying votes?


Ford is a businessman and street-smart – he is no diplomat. His more confrontational approach to fully punish the US for what they are doing to Canada has begun to clash with the calmer more strategic approach of the more seasoned negotiator Carney. There’s a history of these different approaches:


As soon as Trump announced his tariffs Ford put a 25% tariff on Ontario electricity to 1.5 million US homes. The White House was so annoyed and threatening that he had to withdraw it. More recently, Canadian negotiators decided to ignore the urgings of Ford and industry people to immediately slap on reciprocal tariffs on US steel in response to Trump’s devastating doubling of his tariffs. Diplomacy is too delicate to be upset by hard swinging fighters.


Ford has had a good run at being cooperative with the federal Liberal government -- loudly touting a “good friendship” with former Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland, which doubtless helped get federal grants for transit and other projects. 


Ford’s lack of negotiation skills was on display with the agreement with The Austrian company Therme. It is building a spa where Ontario Place used to sit and will be spending $700 million to construct its new facilities on Toronto's waterfront. A New York Times investigation into the company found it only had one spa to its name, and some $1.1 million in equity at the time the Ontario Place deal was struck, operating with what the writers call "shaky" finances. The way that the company came to acquire its whopping 95-year lease of the Toronto lands was also "unusual," the article notes, positioning Ford and his team as naive for placing such faith in the brand without doing due diligence.


Nevertheless Ford’s Captain Canada positioning has helped make him the most popular premier in Canada, and there is no doubt that his friendly folksy manner helped bring unity to the usually disputatious gang of premiers.

 

Many believe he is well positioned to take over the federal Conservative party should the position become vacant. He would certainly become a different kind of federal leader, and his rough edges might be smoothed over in the more demanding federal scene.

Patrick Gossage Insider Political Views

A couple in matching formalwear walks the red carpet, surrounded by photographers and camera flashes.
By Patrick Gossage August 11, 2026
Watching cringeworthy video of our former PM’s hand on popstars Katy Perry’s bum at the Tribeca film festival gave me pause about who our former leader had become.
By Patrick Gossage April 14, 2026
In contrast to US inaction after almost weekly mass killings, it took one horrible shooting rampage at the Ecole Polytechnique in Montreal, in 1980, to start the drive for public policy changes around gun control. But years delays between the mass shooting outrage and actual policy to rid the country of assault rifles doomed the eventual gun buyback program. The polytechnique horror was huge news in our relatively massacre-free nation. That December day, 25-year-old Marc Lépine stalked the hallways and classrooms of the École Polytechnique de Montréal with a semi-automatic rifle and murdered 14 women and injured another 13 people before killing himself. A year later, the Coalition for Gun Control was formed to push for stricter gun laws, led by survivors of the Montreal massacre. Later that year, the federal government passed Bill C-17, which imposed safety training and a mandatory waiting period to get a firearms licence-- not an effective means of controlling automatic rifles. Much later, in1996, Parliament passed the Firearms Act, Bill C-68, driven in part by a push for stricter gun laws following the Montreal massacre. The act created a national firearms registry and imposed new rules for obtaining a gun licence, including background checks. The former Conservative government, under prime minister Stephen Harper, abolished the long-gun registry, which it said placed an unnecessary burden on law-abiding gun owners. Quebec subsequently created its own provincial registry to replace it. It took another horrific killing nine years later in Nova Scotia to force Ottawa to take real action on miliary-style guns. On April 18 and 19, 2020, 51-year-old Gabriel Wortman committed multiple shootings and set fires at 16 locations, killing 22 people before he was killed by the RCMP. On May 1, 2020, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, following through on a 2019 campaign promise, announced an immediate ban on some 1,500 makes and models of assault weapons.. The Canadian government sought to follow New Zealand's lead when at the same time it announced the ban it promised a plan to force gun owners to surrender military-style firearms. But while New Zealand acted quickly, in 2019, Ottawa only launched a long awaited buyback program in 2026. In contrast, the government of then New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda announced its firearms buyback program shortly after a white supremacist killed 51 people at two mosques in Christchurch in March, 2019. In order to move quickly, New Zealand set up mobile units where firearm owners could get refunds in exchange for their firearms. They worked hard to get co-operation from gun owners. Meanwhile, here, the firearms industry and individual gun owners vigorously opposed the project, and it was delayed for years. The program was finally initiated this year with little of the sense of urgency it could have had right after the Nova Scotia killings. It has not been going well. In April, the federal public safety minister's office said more than 67,000 assault-style firearms have been declared by 37,869 firearm owners across Canada. That's just under half of the 136,000 firearms the government had budgeted for when it set aside aside $248.6 million for the program. The precise number of banned firearms in Canada is unknown due to the end of the long-gun registry in 2012. There are other deeper problems. Alberta, Saskatchewan, and Manitoba have indicated they will not assist with the program, meaning police are not co-operating as in New Zealand. Conservative MPs and firearm owners say the buyback is a wasteful exercise that targets law-abiding citizens. The original gun-control advocacy group, PolySeSouvient, blames “weak political leadership” for what it calls “poor participation” in the compensation program. It looks like Ottawa - to put it mildly - has blown the opportunity to really reduce the number of people-killing guns in this country.
More Posts