Why We Refrain From Calling Out the Evil That Surrounds Us

Patrick Gossage • July 31, 2024

It was unusual and instructive to hear the outgoing chief of the Canadian chief of the Defence Staff, General Wayne Eyre quoted in his outgoing speech urging Canada to prepare for war and saying: “The implications of the outcome of this war are momentous for our global future. Evil walks the face of the Earth, and it must be stopped.”

It is now seen as ineffective to characterize modern conflicts as battles between good and evil. It’s been many years since George W. Bush used

the “axis of evil” to describe the bellicose tendencies of Iran, North Korea and Iraq in the early 21 st century.


Yet Eyre correctly said that “evil” walks the face of the earth. It is interesting to note that both the Gospels and the writings of Paul often refer to the

ubiquity of evil. The first epistle of John makes an even more sweeping claim than Eyre: “We know that we are children of God, and that the whole

world is under the control of the evil one.”


Currently in the United States, and to a less degree in Canada, the degree of polarization in political beliefs has led to a liberal conservative gulf where each side increasingly hates and distrusts the other. Survey data reveals that more than half of Republicans and Democrats view the other party as “a threat,” and nearly as many agree with the description of the other party as “evil,” Lillian Mason of John Hopkins University said.


Yet it has been remarkable that Democrats resist calling Trump evil even if he shows so many evil characteristics. Listen to no less an authority than

Jesus himself quoted in Marks’ gospel: ‘‘ For it is from within, out of a person’s heart, that evil thoughts come—sexual immorality,…adultery,

greed, malice, deceit, lewdness, envy, slander, arrogance, and folly.” A pretty comprehensive list of Trum sins. Many believe that Trump has taken cues from dictators, and we have had no problem calling them evil. He takes the same road as the Nazis in demeaning a common enemy – in this case immigrants who he calls savages and backs his statements by threatening to deport the millions of the undocumented.


It is interesting to discover that science studying evil comes to much the same conclusion that the Judeo-Christian teaching of original sin - claiming we all have the capacity to be evil. Paul puts it this way in his epistle to the Romans: “Now if I do what I do not want to do, it is no longer I who do it, but it is sin living in me. So, I find this law at work: Although I want to do good, evil is right there with me.” 


Recent scientific studies of evil come a similar conclusion - that we all have evil thoughts and desires, yet most people don’t act on them. It follows

what we call “evil” will be associated primarily with failures of inhibition. In other words, it’s all about self-control. The apparent normal behaviour

exhibited by many killers would seem to fit with people like the young man who tried to assassinate Trump who suddenly became a crazed assassin.


In a celebrated exchange of letters Sigmund Freud had with Albert Einstein in 1931-32. Einstein asked: “Is it possible to control man’s mental evolution so as to make him proof against the psychosis of hate and destructiveness?” Freud replied that “there is no likelihood of our being able

to suppress humanity’s aggressive tendencies” It has been pointed out that conservatives are so suspicious of people who look for “root causes” of

crime, and why they describe sociology as “the science of excuses.”


However the difficulty of ridding individuals of evil tendencies may be, the collectivity surely has moral standards that should apply to collective action. So, in a broader context, are we reaching a stage in our politics where we must call out the evil of systematic lying and inflated vitriolic hate both conservatives and liberals display for each other in the USA and to a lesser extend in Canada? The much-published US author Arthur C Brooks thinks so. In a 2019 excerpt from a lecture he gave in Australia in the New York Times he wrote: ”It may be true that all humans, all societies, are capable of becoming so corrupted as to come to see destroying others’ lives, outside of open combat, as a needed or heroic thing. (as was the case in Nazi Germany) But societies cannot typically survive undamaged, let alone flourish, if a culture of systematic lying is fostered and allowed to grow.”


This is a stark warning for us all. Even our noble politicians pay the price for outright lies, particularly when it comes to election promises, as is the case of Juston Trudeau who promised in the 2015 federal election to reform the first past the post electoral system. This lie, or the inability to action, has dogged him for nine years.


I feel strongly that calling out evil behavior in our politicians is a civic duty. Freud might be right and curing the individual violence in our society is

extremely challenging, as is bringing peace to Gaza or Ukraine where both sides are convinced they are fighting for good versus evil. But we can

influence our politicians with our votes and ensure that wild rhetoric and lying are not allowed to lead to dangerous actions.

Patrick Gossage Insider Political Views

By Patrick Gossage July 7, 2025
When I was at university in the sixties, it was easy to love being Canadian. Patriotism was easy in the era of Pearson, peacekeeping and his Nobel Prize. He introduced defining landmark social programs like the Canada Pension Plan and universal health care. He also was crucial in launching the new Canadian flag, promoting bilingualism, and fostering a more inclusive immigration policy. His government got into the business of Canadian cultural promotion with the establishment of Telefilm Canada in 1967 to fund Canadian filmmakers. (The crown corporation, the National Film Board, was established in 1939.) The Pearson era went out with a proud Canadian bang at Expo67. Canada was prosperous, our identities, either largely British and French, were secure. The writer and philosopher George Grant, put it this way: “English speaking Canadians have been called a dull and costive lot. In these dynamic days, such qualities are particularly unattractive to the chic. Yet our stodginess has made us a society of greater simplicity, formality, and perhaps even innocence than the people to the south.” This is the society in which most anglo seniors today grew up. Not chic, looking with some envy at the glamour of Hollywood and Broadway, but modest and content. But the seeds of change were there. In Toronto. Italian and Portuguese laborers were being brought in to build subways and suburbs. Canada was about to add to the core French and English culture, and value assumptions far more diverse, and multicultural influences. Multiculturalism became official government policy in 1988. In his speech to the House of Commons, Trudeau stated that no singular culture could define Canada, and that the government accepted “the contention of other cultural communities that they, too, are essential elements in Canada.” A policy of multiculturalism was implemented to promote and respect cultural diversity, and to in fact fund ethnic efforts to preserve and develop their cultures within Canadian society, the opposite of the US “melting pot” objective. Section 27 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms officially recognizes multiculturalism as a Canadian value. In a 1971 speech in Winnipeg to a Ukrainian audience, Trudeau said: “What could be more absurd than the concept of an “all Canadian boy or girl! “ Trudeau greatly enlarged the makeup of the body of immigrants by expanding the ‘family class’. In 1978 immigration act changes allowed new Canadians to sponsor their parents of any age. Those from less-developed nations found this particularly appealing. Trudeau senior’s major accomplishment which ensured the protection of all minority rights was the repatriation of our constitution woth the Charter of Rights and Freedoms Now In Canada, approximately 23.0% of the population are first-generation immigrants, meaning they were born outside of Canada. This figure represents the highest proportion of immigrants in Canada in 150 years and is the highest among G7 countries. Over half of our population are either of English or French heritage. The torch of openness to refugees and immigrants and “diversity is our strength” has been taken up by Justin Trudeau in a big way. He told the New York Times Magazine in October 2014 that Canada could be the “first post national state”. He added: “There is no core identity, no mainstream in Canada.” Many would argue that, yes, there is a core set of Canadian values. Often not recognized, they are regularly reflected in government policies. They set us apart from the United States, form part of our identity, and enrich our life experiences. Pearson and the Trudeaus have been instrumental in implementing Liberal values, ensuring equality of opportunity across the country and that no minority is trampled on. Foremost is universal publicly funded health care, whatever its problems. His son will be remembered for the Canadian Child benefit which today grants parents up to over $6,000 per child, which greatly reduced child poverty and $10 a day daycare. Justin Trudeau also launched publicly funded denticare and started a pharmacare program. Recipients of these programs obviously see them as essential parts of being Canadian. The generally shared values of Canadians include the importance of collective wellbeing, co-operation and social equality and a belief that active governments can improve our lives. Justin Trudeau’s self-declared “feminism” and his making cabinet one half women showed a dedication to equal rights for women which he tirelessly promoted. He was forever promoting the value of “diversity is our strength”. We genuinely welcome immigrants and show a high degree of tolerance for differences. Perhaps the best indication of this is the late seventies welcoming of over 60,000 Vietnamese boat people. As well, after 2015, over 44,000 government and privately sponsored Syrian refugees were settled and helped to establish themselves in Canada. Prime Minister Trudeau personally welcomed the first arrival in Toronto. While seemingly uncontrolled immigration of foreign students and refugees has become more controversial recently, it is accepted that we need immigrants, and the flow is now more rationally controlled. His father also ruled over a Canada that was very pro-Canadian and even anti American – not hard when the United States was immersed in the nightmare of Vietnam. He was well aware of the dangers signaled by George Grant in Lament for a Nation, which predicted the virtual integration of the Canadian and US economies. He established the Foreign Investment Review Agency to break the wholesale takeover of Canadian businesses by US firms. He established Petro Canada to get a window into the largely foreign owned oil and gas sector. And his government was very active in supporting and encouraging Canadian culture. The CRTC mandated Canadian content on our airwaves, spawning a healthy music industry. His son substantially increased funding for the public broadcaster CBC. Then in 1988 came a major shift in our identity and sovereignty. Prime Minister Mulroney wanted a free trade deal with the US and John Turner, the defeated Liberal leader, finally found his voice: “I will not let Brian Mulroney sell out our sovereignty. I will not let this great nation surrender its birthright. I will not let Brian Mulroney destroy a 120-year-old dream called Canada, and neither will Canadians”. But Turner lost, and a new deal sealed the situation we are in today with over 70% of our exports going stateside and Trump determined to wage economic warfare with a country he feels does not have a right to exist and should be the 51 st state: “Economically we have such power over Canada.” In fact, we have inadvertently given him “all the cards” as Trump likes to say. Turner might well say from the grave, “I told you so!” Sovereignty means more than building our own economy more independent of the United States. It means rebuilding the pride we have as Canadians and actually knowing and cherishing its values so different from those south of us. And this seems to be happening ironically, thanks to Trump’s trumpeting us as a 51 st state. Flags are everywhere and as we celebrate our 158 th birthday there is a new patriotism bursting out across the nation. The national anthem is being enthusiastically sung by audiences at all sorts of gatherings and performances. And worry as we may about the diverse cultures and beliefs of the hundreds and thousands of immigrant adults from every corner of the Globe, we know their children going to public schools will become knowledgeable, committed Canadians. There is a Canadian soul which will not be destroyed.
Doug Ford in a suit and tie is talking into a microphone
By Patrick Gossage June 11, 2025
Who is the is the real Doug Ford? Is it the smiling man walking beside Premier of Alberta Danielle Smith into the meeting of the Premiers with the PM intoning “love is in the air”(!) or the inept initiator of the Green Belt scandal which sold protected land to his developer friends – for which he apologized while reversing the order?
More Posts